Analyze the rhetorical mimicry
and satire at work in this New Yorker cartoon. What's being mimicked? What's being satirized? Explain why this cartoon is both apt and funny. What are the two birds I have in mind here? Present your answer as a well written and carefully proofed paragraph.
Girls: Due Thurs. morning, Nov. 10, at 7:30 am.
(Sorry. There's no better way to kill a joke than to analyze it...)
TWO MODEL RESPONSES
I
When surfing through channels, one can easily come across commercials or infomercials that feature overly enthusiastic salespeople pitching new, innovative diet pills or other methods for losing a tremendous amount of weight in a very short time. These ads are loaded with clichés and platitudes, much like political speeches. When running for office, candidates tend to promise a higher quality of life and a better country for the citizens. Particularly in our current economic situation, candidates are offering budget cuts and programs that will create a flurry of job openings. By portraying a man watching a politician deliver a trite speech containing a number of classic weight loss commercial lines, the cartoonist has cleverly satirized weight loss commercials and political speeches.
The rhetoric of the speech alludes to current issues that our government faces each day. The speaker, who vows to “trim ugly fat and waste from government,” is clearly a target of mockery due to his overzealous language. He includes phrases that allude to extreme weight loss commercials in his address regarding government. The picture elicits chuckles and smirks because this is a concept that we all know too well. We are all familiar with the jargon of politicians, the ever reassuring and far-fetched ideas that they present to their voters. Just turn on a television and one can listen to any politician claiming that they will solve the world’s biggest problems. At the same time, turn on the television to find infomercials with salespeople bragging how they can transform an overweight man into a trim and healthy figure. This is most appropriate now because we are on the verge of the 2012 presidential election, and we are already beginning to see such far-fetched bids for election from many candidates. (BY SADE COOPER)
II.
Cartoons are created for many purposes: to engage the audience, provoke questions, satirize societal tendencies, etc. In this New Yorker cartoon, the cartoonist depicts a presidential candidate blabbering to the television viewer about a crash program that will turn government waste into super services. The cartoonist not only mimics the over-promising rhetoric used by politicians, but also satirizes the similar platitudinous rhetoric of dietary programs and commercialization.
This cartoon is funny because of the obvious exaggeration, the genuineness of the presidential candidate portrayal, and how bona fide his figure and flag placement appear. It is apt because it attacks both diet programs and elections very accurately in the diction it uses, such as "super services," "for you the American people," "natural mechanism" and others.
The two birds that are being killed by the one stone are diet commercials and presidential candidates popularity attempts. The cartoon is very comparable to an exercise program because it indicates that government will lose all its fat and waste to make it look beautiful and natural. It seemingly equates presidential candidates, such as the "Herman Cains" and "Mitt Romneys," to exercise program representatives.
Both commercials over-promise and make guarantees that are virtually impossible or totally unfeasible to fulfill.
This cartoon is a commentary on how politics have reached a new low in terms of media. Presidential candidates just do whatever pleases the American people. The cartoonist uses his cartoon to send the message that the age of candidates being over-promising must terminate, or else the American government will become the new, effective exercise program.
(BY DYLAN COOPER)